LOCK / LOCKE DNA TEST RESULTS
Updated 10/30/2009

The Lock / Locke DNA project is open to all Lock(e)'s of the world regardless where you come from. 
There is currently 64 Lock(e) men in the project! 

DNA NEWS!!!!!!!!! 

67 Y Chromosome marker kit now available! 

Group 11 has just been created!

Check out the new Most Recent Common Ancestor chart
http://www.ftdna.com/faq2.html

In the first box, "By family #, you can go back to the Family List (this page has been updated and changed)  and look to see who family number 5 is etc: , if your family is not listed, please send me your info so I can get you added to the list. The next box, is the test number, given by Family tree DNA project. 

Feel free to email me if you have questions regarding the DNA test. 
lockeroots@comcast.net Donald G. Locke Jr. 

1 Free 12 marker DNA test is being offered by a sponsor if he can prove his kinship to 
Leander Lock b. 1822 of Lincoln County Tennessee. Email me if you are one of his descendants and are willing to take the test. 


A free 25 marker DNA kit has been offered to the Lock(e) man who can prove his kinship back to
Francis Alexander Locke through any of his sons. This family lived in Union County Arkansas as late as the 1960's, possibly still in Union County Arkansas
today. Looking for male Lock(e) descendants of Francis Alexander Locke b. December 11, 1827 Alabama, d. January 04, 1902 Union County Arkansas.
Some descendants moved on to Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico. If you are a direct male
Francis Alexander Locke descendant, please contact me privately

Join the Lock / Locke DNA project
Lock(e) DNA join link USA
Or for you in Europe http://www.familytreedna.ch/ 
Be sure to state your joining the Locke DNA project in order to get the project discount prices!
We need donations to the project. Several of the Lock(e)'s I have talked to have financial difficulties that prevent them from participating. You can help by making a donation towards the project. There are currently 2 men on the waiting list for a free 12 marker test. 
A donation can help pay for a 12 marker test, 25 marker test, 37 marker test. Or help upgrade an existing test.  http://www.familytreeDNA.com/contribution.html 
There is currently $8.00 in the general fund. 
With your support, this project can only get bigger and better! 

To date, 5 free tests have been ordered thanks to sponsor's! And the project paid in part for 2 tests. Thank you all for your support and keep up the great work! 
Here is a link to view all the kind folks who have made donations to the Lock / Locke DNA project. http://mywebpages.comcast.net/lockeroots/DNADonations.html


Test kits starting with the letter N, are National Geographic Society, Genographic DNA project who have transferred their tests to FTDNA. 

Haplo Group listed in Green have been SNP tested and confirmed. 
Tests in Red are unconfirmed and are estimated.  

For Groups only: Markers in white indicate a mutation between cousins. Markers mutate every so often, it doesn't mean a whole lot really, but it is of interest to note which branches of the tree had certain marker mutations. As more men are tested, we may find someone who DNA tests who doesn't know who his ancestors were. Through certain mutations, we might be able to identify exactly which branch of a tree he descended from just by looking at certain mutations he may carry. 

 

 

D
N
S

3
9
3

D
N
S

3
9
0

D
N
S

1
9
or
3
9
4

D
N
S

3
9
1



 D
N
S

3
8
5
a


 D
N
S

3
8
5
b


 D
N
S

4
2
6



 D
N
S

3
8
8



 D
N
S

4
3
9



 D
N
S

3
8
9
-
1

 D
N
S

3
9
2



 D
N
S

3
8
9
-
2

 D
N
S

4
5
8



 D
N
S

4
5
9
a


 D
N
S

4
5
9
b


 D
N
S

4
5
5



 D
N
S

4
5
4



 D
N
S

4
4
7



 D
N
S

4
3
7



 D
N
S

4
4
8



 D
N
S

4
4
9



 D
N
S

4
6
4
a


 D
N
S

4
6
4
b


 D
N
S

4
6
4
c


 D
N
S

4
6
4
d


 D
N
S

4
6
4
e

 

 D
N
S

4
6
4
f

 

 D
N
S

4
6
0



 D
N
S

G
A
T
A

H
4		 D
N
S

Y
C
A

I
I
a		 D
N
S

Y
C
A

I
I
b		 D
N
S

4
5
6



 D
N
S

6
0
7



 D
N
S

5
7
6



 D
N
S

5
7
0



 D
N
S

C
D
A

a

 D
N
S

C
D
A

b

 D
N
S

4
4
2



 D
N
S

4
3
8



 D
N
S

5
3
1



 D
N
S

5
7
8



 D
N
S

3
9
5
S
1
A
 D
N
S

3
9
5
S
1
B
 D
N
S

5
9
0



 D
N
S

5
3
7



 D
N
S

6
4
1



 D
N
S

4
7
2



 D
N
S

4
0
6
S
1

 D
N
S

5
1
1



 D
N
S

4
2
5



 D
N
S

4
1
3
A


 D
N
S

4
1
3
B


 D
N
S

5
5
7



 D
N
S

5
9
4



 D
N
S

4
3
6



 D
N
S

4
9
0



 D
N
S

5
3
4



 D
N
S

4
5
0



 D
N
S

4
4
4



 D
N
S

4
8
1



 D
N
S

5
2
0



 D
N
S

4
4
6



 D
N
S

6
1
7



 D
N
S

5
6
8



 D
N
S

4
8
7



 D
N
S

5
7
2



 D
N
S

6
4
0



 D
N
S

4
9
2



 D
N
S

5
6
5
Lock/Locke by Family # Test
Kit #		 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25     26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
Group 1 
Descendants of William Locke of Woburn Massachusetts USA. 
Test Kit 35457 is possibly a name change from Kendall to Locke.
Family # 3 33787 R1b1b2 13 24 14 10 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 17 9 10 11 11 25 14 18 30 15 15 16 17 - - 11 10 19 23 16 15 20 15 36 36 12 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 3 129241 R1b1b2 13 24 14 11 13 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 18 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 17 17 - - 11 11 19 23 15 15 16 16 35 37 12 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 3 111402 R1b1b2 13 24 14 11 13 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 18 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 17 17 - - 11 11 19 23 15 15 17 16 35 37 12 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 3 63350 R1b1b2 13 24 14 11 13 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 18 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 17 17 - - 12 11 19 23 15 15 17 16 34 37 12 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 3 38735 R1b1b2 13 24 14 11 13 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 3a* 35457 R1b1 13 23 15 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 30 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Group 2
Kits 21343 & 42213 are Descendants of Richard Lock Jr. b. about 1699 of Calvert County Maryland USA 
to Frederick County & Berkeley County Virginia, through his son Rev. Jacob Lock of Barren County, Kentucky. 
Richard Lock Sr. was likely married to Mary Eldridge 1698 in Ampney Crucis, Gloucestershire, England.  

Kit 44581 & 69777 are descendants of John Lock b. 1726 of Frederick County and Berkeley County Virginia. 
John Lock is most likely the son of Richard Lock Jr.  

Kit # 49785 is a Joseph Lock descendant, Son of Richard Lock Jr. 

Kit # 68973 Is a Henry Lock descendant from South Cerney, Gloucestershire, England 1770's, no paper trail to Richard Lock yet. 
Family # 5 42213

H1

 12 22 15 10 15 17 11 12 11 14 11 30 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 5 44581

H1

 12 22 15 10 15 17 11 12 11 14 11 30 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 5  69777

H1

 12 22 15 10 15 17 11 14 11 14 11 30 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 5 49785

H1

 12 22 15 10 15 17 11 12 11 14 11 30 17 9 9 10 12 24 14 19 32 12 12 14 15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 5 21343

H1a

 12 22 15 10 15 17 11 12 11 14 11 30 18 9 9 10 12 24 14 19 32 12 12 14 15 - - 11 11 19 21 15 11 19 16 36 37 12

9

 11 8 16 16 8 10 10 8 11 9 0 21 21 19 10 12 12 17 8 14 24 20 16 12 11 12 9 12 14 11
Family # 5a 68973

H1a

 12 22 15 10 15 17 11 12 11 14 11 30 18 9 9 10 12 24 14 19 32 12 12 14 15 - - 11 11 19 21 15 11 19 16 36 37 12 9 11 8 16 16 8 10 10 8 11 9 0 21 21 19 10 12 12 16 8 14 23 20 16 12 11 12 9 12 14 11
Group 3
Descendants of Philip Lock of New Jersey. 
Kits: 25124 & 25125 Descendants of Jesse McCulloch Locke of Chester County South Carolina. 
Kit: 44668 & Kit 82566 Descendant of Levi Lock of Chester County South Carolina 

Kit 135263 ordered his kit 10/4/2008, but never returned the kit. Presuming he had a change of heart? 
Family # 28 82566 R1b1b2 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 18

9

9

 11 11 25 15 19 31 15 15 17 17 - - 11 11 19 22 16 15 17 17 35 39 12 12 11

9

 16 16

8

 10 10

8

 10 11 12 23 23 16 10 12 10 17

8

 12 22 20 14 12 11 13 11 11 12 12
Family # 28 25124 R1b1b2 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 18 9 9 11 11 25 15 19 31 15 15 17 17 - - 11 11 19 22 16 15 17 18 35 39 12 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 28 N67006 R1b1b2 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 18 9 9 11 11 25 15 19 31 15 15 17 17 - - 12 11 19 22 16 15 17 17 35 39 12 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 28* 25125 R1b1b2 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 18 9 9 11 11 25 15 19 32 15 15 17 17 - - 11 11 19 22 16 15 17 17 35 39 12 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 28 44668 R1b1b2 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 31 142103 R1b1b2 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29                                                                                                                  
Family # 28 135263

-

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Group 4
Descendants of Capt. John Locke of Rye New Hampshire USA
Kits 60355, 45693, N15385 are descendants of Capt. John Locke
Kit "Ancestry" was tested with Ancestry.com's DNA kit, and because they use a slightly different format, I am unable to use the entire kit here. 

Kit 97792 is a descendant of William Lock b. about 1798 in Kentucky, lived in Illinois and settled in Washington County Missouri by 1850. 
No paper trail to Capt. John Locke at this time. 
Family # 1 60355

J2

 12 24 15 9 11 16 11 16 11 13 11 29 14 8 9 11 11 26 14 21 33 13 13 15 16 - 16 10 10 19 22 17 14 17 17 35 41 12 9 11 7 14 15 8 11 10 8 10 10 12 17 17 16 10 12 12 17 9 13 22 21 14 13 11 15 11 12 12 12
Family # 1 45693

J2 

 12 24 15 9 11 16 11 16 11 13 11 29 14 8 9 11 11 26 14 21 32 13 13 16 16 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 1 N15385

J2

12 24 15 9 11 17 11 16 11 13 11 29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 1 Ancestry

J2

12  24 15 9 11 17 11 16 11 13 11 29 14 8 9 11 11 26 14 21 32 13 13 15 16 - - 10 10 19 22 17 - - - - - 12 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 1 Genebase

J2

12 24 15 9 11 16 11 16 11 13 11 29 12 8 9 11 10 26 14 21 32 13 15 15 16 - - 10 11 19 22 17 17 - 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 59 97792

 J2

 12 24 15 9 11 16 11 16 11 13 11 29 14 8 9 11 11 26 14 21 32 13 13 13 15 16 16 10 10 19 22 17 14 17 17 35 41 12 9 11 7 14 15 8 11 10 8 10 10 12 17 17 16 10 12 12 17 9 13 22 21 14 13 11 15 11 12 12 12
Group 5
Kit # 57995 Descendants of Thomas Locke b. May 02, 1750 St. Albans, Hertfordshire, England, 
d. August 01, 1826 Sevier County , Tennessee U.S.A.
& wife Susannah Henry 
Family # 31 57995

I1

 13 22 15 10 13 16 11 14 12 12 11 28 15 8 9 8 11 23 16 20 28 12 14 15 16 - - 10 10 19 22 14 14 16 19 32 37 12 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 31 58074

I1

 13 22 15 10 13 16 11 14 12 12 11 28 15 8 9 8 11 23 16 20 28 12 14 15 16 - - 10 10 19 22 14 14 16 19 32 36 12 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Group 6 
Kit # 48156 & 60256 William Hamilton Lock b. May 19, 1808 in Virginia
He married Cynthia Pierce and they lived in Lincoln County, Tennessee
This is a 12/12 marker match to family # 13
Kit # 31502 John Lock b. abt 1650 in England? , 
his descendants lived in Northumberland County Virginia. Through his son Richard W. Lock
Kit # 68501 Green W. Lock b. about 1818 of Williamson County , Tennessee

There is no paper trail to link in family 52, 13, 53, but they are good 12/12 matches and do have some things in common with each other. 
Until all 4 participants upgrade, we can not be sure if they will continue to be a good match at the higher marker levels. 
Family # 52 60256 R1b1b2 13 24 14 10 12 15 12 12 12 13 13 29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 52 48156 R1b1b2 13 24 14 10 12 15 12 12 12 13 13 29 17 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 17 17 - - 11 11 19 23 16 15 16 18 36 38 12 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # ? 160078

R1b1b2

 13 24 14 10 12 15 12 12 12 13 13 29 17 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 17 17 - - 11 11 19 23 16 15 16 18 36 38 12 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 13 31502 R1b1b2 13 24 14 10 12 15 12 12 12 13 13 29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 53 68501 R1b1b2 13 24 14 10 12 15 12 12 12 13 13 29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Group 7 
Kit 68864 Robert L. Lock b. October 12, 1798 and wife Mary Holeman of Mercer County, Kentucky, his parents are unknown
Kit 74741 Thomas Lock b. about 1790 and wife Mary Pullen, of Lincoln County, Kentucky, his parents are unknown.
There is no paper trail to link the 2 branches together yet, but with a good 66/67 match, this is very likely a good kinship. 
Kit 87671 William Lock b. about 1779 of Mercer County Kentucky & Switzerland County Indiana. Likely descendant of Peter Lock of Mercer County Ky. 
Kit 135744 David Lock b. December 29, 1793 in Lincoln? County Kentucky & wife Elanor Hamblen. This family resided in Adams County, Illinois 1840-1880's
Family # 55 74741

I1

 13 23 15 11 13 14 11 14 11 12 11 28 16 8 9 8 11 23 16 20 28 12 15 15 15 - - 10 10 19 21 14 15 16 17 35 38 12 10 11 8 14 15 8 11 10 8 9 9 12 22 24 15 10 12 12 16 8 13 25 20 13 13 11 12 11 11 12 11
Family # 10 135744

I1

 13 23 15 11 13 14 11 14 11 12 11 28 16 8 9 8 11 23 16 20 28 12 15 15 15 - - 10 10 19 21 14 15 16 17 35 37 12 10 11 8 14 15 8 11 10 8 9 9 12 22 24 15 10 12 12 16 8 13 25 20 13 13 11 12 11 11 12 11
Family # 33 68864

I1

 13 23 15 11 13 14 11 14 11 12 11 28 16 8 9 8 11 23 16 20 28 12 15 15 15 - - 10 10 19 21 14 15 16 17 36 38 12 10 11 8 14 15 8 11 10 8 9 9 12 22 24 15 10 12 12 16 8 13 25 20 13 13 11 12 11 11 12 11
Family # 57 87671

 I1

 13 23 15 11 13 14 11 14 11 12 11 29 17 8 9 8 11 23 16 20 28 12 15 15 15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Group 8 
Kit 91908 John Lock b. about 1796 of Virginia, lived in Lincoln County Tennessee, son of Noah Lock
Kit 120023 Ephraim Lock b. 1796 of Virginia, he lived in Giles and Lincoln County Tennessee
He is thought to be the son of Noah and Mary Lock of Virginia, family # 20
Kit 110664 Jacob Lock of Hampshire County Virginia, through his son
Abraham Lock b. 1733 of Lee County Virginia, later lived in Chariton County Missouri.
His descendants moved to Benton County and Polk County Oregon. 
Kit 99832 Abraham Lock b. 1755 Wyverstone, Suffolk, England 
Kit 129840 Samuel Lock b. 1752 of Washington County and Montgomery County Virginia
No paper trail to link the 5 family's together yet
Family # 20 91908 R1b1b2 13 22 14 11 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 28 17 8 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 15 17 - - 11 10 19 23 16 15 16 18 38 38 12 12 11 9 15 16 8 11 10 8 10 10 12 23 23 17 10 12 12 16 8 12 22 20 13 12 11 13 11 11 13 11
Family # 18 120023 R1b1b2g 13 22 14 11 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 28 17 8 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 15 17 - - 11 10 19 23 16 15 16 18 38 38 13 12 11 9 15 16 8 11 10 8 11 11 12 23 23 17 10 12 12 15 8 12 22 20 13 12 11 13 11 11 13 11
Family # 8 110664 R1b1b2 13 22 14 11 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 28 17 8 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 15 17 - - 12 10 19 23 16 15 16 18 37 38 13 12 11 9 15 16 8 11 10 8 10 10 12 23 23 17 10 12 12 15 8 12 23 20 13 12 11 13 11 11 13 11
Family # 7 129840 R1b1b2 13 22 14 11 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 28 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family #60  99832 R1b1b2 13 22 14 11 11 15 12 12 11 13 13 28 17 8 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 16 17 - - 11 10 19 23 16 15 16 18 38 38 12 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Group  9
Kit 47778 John Lock, b. Barbados, d. Philadelphia before 1737.  Wife Mary Oakley, d. Philadelphia 1737

Kit 36565 William Lock b. 1807 in Chittlehampton, Devon County, England. He immigrated to Grundy County Illinois USA 11-Sep-1871
No paper trail to link the 2 family's together yet. 

Family # 35 47778 R1b1b2 12 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 17 9 9 11 11 24 16 19 30 14 15 17 18 - - 11 11 19 23 15 17 18 18 39 41 12 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 44 36565 R1b1b2 12 24 14 11 11 14 12 13 12 13 13 29 17 9 9 11 11 24 16 19 29 14 15 17 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Group  10
Kit # 28351 & Kit 114756 Descendants of Rowan County North Carolina
Kit 31028 John Lock b. abt 1776 of Virginia, lived in Lincoln County Tennessee
Through his son William Lock and wife Julia Vickers or Vichus? 
Family # 4 28351

I1

 13 23 14 10 14 14 11 14 11 12 11 28 15 8 9 8 11 23 16 20 28 12 14 15 16 - - 10 10 19 21 13 13 16 20 36 36 12 10 11 8 15 15 8 11 10 8 9 10 12 23 23 16 10 12 12 17 8 13 25 20 13 13 11 12 10 11 12 11
Family # 4 114756

I1

 13 23 14 10 14 14 11 14 11 12 11 28 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Group  11
Kit 79394 & Kit 141131 Descendants of Rev. Thomas Lock of New Jersey whom migrated to Pennsylvania. 
An 1874 article was sent to me and in that article it clearly said Thomas Lock was a brother of Philip Lock, both of New Jersey. 
Family # 56 79394 R1b1b2 13 23 14 11 11 15 12 12 11 13 13 28 18 9 10 11 11 26 15 19 30 14 15 17 18 - - 10 11 19 23 16 15 17 18 37 37 12 11 11 9 15 16 8 10 10 8 10 10 12 21 21 16 10 12 12 15 8 12 23 20 13 12 11 15 10 11 13 12
Family # 56  141131 R1b1b2 13 23 14 11 11 15 12 12 11 13 13 28 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Below are tests with no matches to date. As matches are found, they will either go into a group, or a group will be 
created.
Family # 48 45780

I1

 13 21 14 11 13 14 11 14 11 12 11 28 14

8

9

8

 11 23 16 20 30 12 14 15 16 - - 11 10 19 21 14 14 16 21 34 35 11 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 39 39536 R1b1b2 13 23 14 10 11 14 12 12 13 13 13 30 17

9

 10 11 11 25 15 19 30 15 15 17 17 - - 11 11 19 23 16 15 18 18 36 37 12 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 2 33597 R1b1b2 13 25 14 10 11 16 12 12 12 13 13 29 17 10 10 11 11 25 15 29 31 15 15 15 15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 51 N18196 R1b12g 13 23 14 10 12 14 12 12 12 14 13 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 92 148328

I1

 13 23 14 10 13 14 11 14 11 13 11 29 17 8 9 8 11 24 16 20 29 12 14 14 15 - - 10 10 19 21 13 13 17 20 35 38 12 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 12 31028

I1

 13 23 14 10 14 15 11 15 11 12 13 28 15

8

9 8 11 24 16 19 29 12 15 16 16 - - 10 10 19 19 14 14 16 21 35 36 12 10 12 8 15 15 8 11 10 8 9 10 12 23 25 15 10 12 12 16 8 12 25 20 13 13 11 12 11 11 12 11
Family # 34 30374 R1b1b2 13 23 14 11 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 29 18

9

9

 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 17 17 - - 11 11 19 23 16 15 17 17 37 39 12 12 11 9 15 16 8 10 10 8 10 10 12 23 23 16 10 12 12 15 8 13 22 20 13 12 11 13 11 11 12 12
Family # 47 N2389 R1b1b2 13 23 14 11 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 29 19

9

10 11 11 24 15 19 29 15 16 17 18 - - 11 10 19 23 17 15 17 18 36 37 12 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 49 46359 R1b1b2 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 12 13 28 17 9 10 11 11 24 15 20 31 15 15 17 17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 45 36487 R1b1b2 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 31 17  9 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 17 18 - - 11 11 19 23 16 14 18 18 35 39 12 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 9 40530 R1b1b2e 13 24 14 11 12 13 12 12 12 13 14 29 17 9 10 12 11 25 15 18 29 15 15 15 17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 62 105481 R1b1b2 13 23 14 12 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 30 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 2 33597 R1b1b2 13 25 14 10 11 16 12 12 12 13 13 29 17 10 10 11 11 25 15 29 31 15 15 15 15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 4 N4146 R1a 13 25 16 10 11 15 12 12 11 13 11 31 15 9 9 11 11 24 14 20 32 12 15 16 16 - - 12 11 19 23 14 16 19 19 34 39 12 11 11 8 17 17 8 11 10 8 9 10 12 22 22 15 10 12 12 13 8 14 23 23 12 12 11 13 10 11 12 13
Family # 64 116319 R1b1b2 13 25 15 11 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 29 18 9 10 11 11 25 15 17 30 15 15 16 17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # ? 62332 R1b1 14 23 14 12 11 14 12 12 12 12 13 28 19 9 10 12 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 16 19 - - 11 13 19 23 16 15 18 16 36 39 12 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family # 93 161511 R1b1b2 15 24 14 10 13 13 12 12 12 13 13 29 16 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 16 17 - - 10 10 19 24 16 16 19 18 36 36 12 12 11 9 15 16 8 10 10 8 10 10 12 22 22 13 10 12 12 15 8 12 22 20 13 12 11 13 10 12 12 12
Family # ?
African American		 N4885 E1b1a 15 21 15 10 16 19 11 12 11 13 11 29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Example so you know how to compare your results to another participants test. 

This example, I will show you two 12 marker tests that do not match. 
13 25 14 10 11 16 12 12 12 13 13 29
13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29
----------------------------------------------- Subtract one set of numbers from the other
0   1    0   1   0   2   0   0   0   0   0   0  <--- then add the numbers up = 4
Then subtract 4 from 12 = 8    This is an 8/12 match. The same applies for 25 marker tests, 
and 37 marker tests. You just have more numbers to compare with. The closer the match the better. 

If there are no mismatched numbers, you have an exact match with that other participant. 
For the 12 marker test, anything less than 12/12 is considered to be very iffy if there is a kinship. 
But it is still possible.

This chart is supplied by Family Tree DNA.

Table 1. Probability for Most Recent Common Ancestor (MRCA)

Number of matching markers

50% probability
that the MRCA was no longer than this number of generations

90% probability
that the MRCA was no longer than this number of generations

95% probability
that the MRCA was no longer than this number of generations

10 of 10

16.5

56

72

11 of 12

17

39

47

12 of 12

7

23

29

23 of 25

11

23

27

 

24 of 25

7

16

20

 

25 of 25

3

10

13

 

35 of 37

6

12

14

 

36 of 37

4

8

10

 

37 of 37

2 to 3

5

7

 

55 of 59

8

14

16

 

56 of 59

6

11

13

 

57 of 59

4

9

11

 

58 of 59

3

6

8

 

59 of 59

1 to 2

4

5

 

Haplo Group descriptions from FTDNA ©
Y Haplo Group descriptions associated with this project to date.

H - H1  This haplogroup is nearly completely restricted to India, Sri Lanka, and Pakistan

I1b  The Balkan countries likely harbored this subgroup of I during the Last Glacial Maximum. Today, this branch is found distributed in the Balkans and Eastern Europe, and extends further east with Slavic-speaking populations

J2  This lineage originated in the northern portion of the Fertile Crescent where it later spread throughout central Asia, the Mediterranean, and south into India. As with other populations with Mediterranean ancestry this lineage is found within Jewish populations.

R1  The undifferentiated R1 lineage is quite rare. It is found only at very low frequencies in Europe, Central Asia, and South Asia. This lineage possibly originated in Europe and then migrated east into Asia.

R1a  The R1a lineage is believed to have originated in the Eurasian Steppes north of the Black & Caspian Seas. This lineage is thought to descend from a population of the Kurgan culture, known for the domestication of the horse (circa 3000 B.C.E.). These people were also believed to be the first speakers of the Indo-European language group. This lineage is found in central & western Asia, India, and in Slavic populations of Europe.

R1a1  The R1a lineage is believed to have originated in the Eurasian Steppes north of the Black & Caspian Seas. This lineage is thought to descend from a population of the Kurgan culture, known for the domestication of the horse (circa 3000 B.C.E.). These people were also believed to be the first speakers of the Indo-European language group. This lineage is found in central & western Asia, India, and in Slavic populations of Europe.

R1b  Haplogroup R1b is the most common haplogroup in European populations. It is believed to have expanded throughout Europe as humans re-colonized after the last glacial maximum 10-12 thousand years ago. This lineage is also the haplogroup containing the Atlantic modal haplotype

R1b1  Haplogroup R1b is the most common haplogroup in European populations. It is believed to have expanded throughout Europe as humans re-colonized after the last glacial maximum 10-12 thousand years ago. This lineage is also the haplogroup containing the Atlantic modal haplotype.

R1b1b  This haplogroup has been detected in some populations throughout Eurasia. Its spread may have been aided by trade such as that along the Silk Road. Further research will help in identifying its origins, history, and distribution

R1b1c  Haplogroup R1b is the most common haplogroup in European populations. It is believed to have expanded throughout Europe as humans re-colonized after the last glacial maximum 10-12 thousand years ago. This lineage is also the haplogroup containing the Atlantic modal haplotype.

R1b1c6  Haplogroup R1b is the most common haplogroup in European populations. It is believed to have expanded throughout Europe as humans re-colonized after the last glacial maximum 10-12 thousand years ago. Its branch R1b1c6 is found primarily in the British Isles, but can also be found at lower frequencies around Western Europe.

R1b1c7  Haplogroup R1b is the most common haplogroup in European populations. It is believed to have expanded throughout Europe as humans re-colonized after the last glacial maximum 10-12 thousand years ago. Its branch R1b1c7 is primarily found in Northern Ireland, and contains the Niall Modal Haplotype.

E3a  Haplogroup E3a is an African lineage. It is currently hypothesized that this haplogroup dispersed south from northern Africa within the last 3,000 years with the Bantu agricultural expansion. E3a is also the most common lineage among African Americans. It can be found at its highest frequency in Senegal and is also found at a very low frequency in North Africa and the Middle East.

Y Haplo Groups not associated with this project at this time.

 through the Altai / Baikal region of northern Eurasia into the Americas.

C3  The C3 lineage is believed to have originated in southeast or central Asia. This lineage then spread into northern Asia, and then into the Americas.

D  Haplogroup D is an old lineage that evolved in Asia where it is hypothesized to have been widely distributed. This Haplogroup was present in the first people to colonize Japan. This Haplogroup was later displaced from much of Asia by other colonizing groups, but is still present at intermediate frequencies in the aboriginal Japanese and on the Tibetan plateau. It is also found at low frequencies in Mongolian populations and the Altais people of central Asia.

E  This lineage originates in Africa and is nearly completely restricted to African populations.

E1  This haplogroup is restricted to Africa where it occurs at intermediate frequencies. It is less common than its sister lineage E3a.

E2  This haplogroup is restricted to Africa where it occurs at intermediate frequencies. It is less common than its sister lineage E3a.

E3  This lineage is rare in European populations tested and is geographically restricted to sub-Saharan Africa. It is most frequent in Ethiopian populations and probably originated in eastern Africa.

G  This lineage may have originated in India or Pakistan, and has dispersed into central Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. The G2 branch of this lineage (containing the P15 mutation) is found most often in the Europe and the Middle East.

G2  The G lineage may have originated in India or Pakistan, and has dispersed into central Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. The G2 branch of this lineage (containing the P15 mutation) is found most often in the Europe and the Middle East.

I  Haplogroup I dates to 23,000 years ago or longer. Lineages not in branches I1a, I1b or I1c are found distributed at low frequency throughout Europe.

I1a1  The I1a lineage likely has its roots in Northern France. Today it is found most frequently within Viking / Scandinavian populations in northwest Europe and has since spread down into Central and Eastern Europe, where it is found at low frequencies.

I1a3  The I1a lineage likely has its roots in northern France. Today it is found most frequently within Viking / Scandinavian populations in northwest Europe and has since spread down into Central and Eastern Europe, where it is found at low frequencies.

I1a4  The I1a lineage likely has its roots in northern France and is found most frequently found today within Viking / Scandinavian populations in northwest Europe. Its I1a4 branch is found scattered in eastern and southeastern Europe.

I1b  The Balkan countries likely harbored this subgroup of I during the Last Glacial Maximum. Today, this branch is found distributed in the Balkans and Eastern Europe, and extends further east with Slavic-speaking populations.

J1  Haplogroup J1 is found at highest frequencies in Middle Eastern and north African populations where it most likely evolved. This marker has been carried by Middle Eastern traders into Europe, central Asia, India, and Pakistan. The Cohen modal lineage is found in Haplogroup J1*.

K2  The K2 lineage is an old lineage presently found only at low frequencies in Africa, Asia, and in the Middle East. This specific line is found at low frequency in southern Europe, Northern Africa, and the Middle East.

N  This haplogroup is distributed throughout Northern Eurasia. It is the most common Y-chromosome type in Uralic speakers (Finns and Native Siberian). This lineage most likely originated in northern China or Mongolia and then spread into Siberia where it became a very common line in western Siberia.

O  This lineage dates to about 35,000 years ago when it evolved in Central or East Asia. Over 80% of today's East Asian population is haplogroup O, and this lineage is nearly completely restricted to East Asian populations.

O1  This haplogroup is found at very high frequency in the aboriginal Taiwanese (possibly due to genetic drift). This haplogroup probably originated in East Asia and later migrated into the south Pacific. Individuals carrying this lineage are thought to have been important in the expansion of the Austronesian language group into Taiwan, Indonesia, Melanesia, Micronesia, and Polynesia.

Q  The Q lineage is the lineage that links Asia and the Americas. This lineage is found in North and Central Asian populations as well as native Americans. Among European populations, haplogroup Q is found most frequently in Eastern Europe and Scandinavia. This lineage is believed to have originated in Central Asia and migrated